well, random update
1. i got a new job - proof operator data entry 19 hours a week at bank of america. i start October 21st.
it is casual dress code and i
can wear all my piercings, show my tattoos, and color my hair whatever
color i want to. i'm very excited
to have that freedom, it should help balance
out the monotony of the job. i'm hoping i can handle the work
load and school load...i
will find out and the next few months should
prepare me for the next few years at ASU.
2. i'm going back to ASU!! major = English-Linguistics
3. i am going to get a new piercing
4. i am going to color my hair pink
5. i am going to buy a new bed
6. i am going to buy a new desk (at least a computer desk, if not
a new totally awesome office desk that is computer desk plus some...i
need way more space than the current desk i have offers)
7. i am going to buy a new TV and DVD/VCR combo so i can do my yoga in my room
8. i am going to buy either a new dresser or large nightstand for the new TV combo
9. i am going to make more lists
10. i am going to work out on a regular/weekly basis - i would
like to lose 20 pounds and get in the most awesome shape i've ever
been, and keep it like that for the rest of my life
11. i am going to read more
12. i am going to write
13. i am going to devote my semester break to items # 10, 11, and 12...haha
14. i am allowing myself to become addicted to caffeine if necessary
15. i want to not drink
16. i am going to buy a new printer (the one i have now is being
all weird, and guess what i have a million and one papers due)
17. i AM going to pass my philosophy of ethics class if it kills me
18. which brings me to the fact that i need to write a 2 page
paper for my ethics class, due this monday. this is what i will
be working on
once i log off: In seeking the role for religion in morality, john
arthur draws on john dewey's idea of conscience as an idealized,
internalized forum within the
moral agent. a moral agent, arthur says, could include god as a
member of the forum. suppose, however,
that neilsen is right, that, since one must
understand morality to determine that a claimed revelation is a real
revelation, god cannot
serve as a logical ground for
moral belief. the agent must embrace the (presumed) truth
first. if neilsen is right, must arthur be wrong?
if god as objective reality cannot serve logically, could an internalized, essentially imagined god serve logically as a member of the moral forum? why?
| | annakristen_13 (![[info]](http://l-stat.livejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif?v=92.1){kind=small} annakristen_13) wrote, |
procrastinate
- Post a new comment
- 0 comments
- Post a new comment
- 0 comments
